Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At the Defendant’s residence in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government CB02, the Defendant owned and kept three points of goods worth KRW 200,000 in total of one electronic siren, one computer, and one composite market value.

The enforcement officer D, who belongs to the Seoul Central District Court, delegated the execution of Hyundai Ddyke, Hyundai Dyke Co., Ltd., and attached the above goods at the defendant's residence on October 7, 2015 with the title of enforcement of the seizure order of 3003 of the above court's 2015.

However, on June 1, 2016, the defendant moved the above goods from his residence to his non-explosive land without the approval of the execution officer, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the seizure indication.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the third public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a record of seizure of corporeal movables, list of seizure of corporeal movables, or protocol of impossibility of auction of corporeal movables;

1. Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 140 (1) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;