However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 9, 2016, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol on December 22 and 45, 2016, arrived at the emergency room of the University Hospital in 119 first-aid services, having a net speed of 6:31,00 in the south-gu, South-gu, Yancheon-gu, by a 119 first-aid vehicle, and committed assault, without any justifiable reason, to injure the body of the victim C (Woo, 31 years old), to scarprof, and to knife both knife at the female toilet.

2. At the date and time set forth in the above 1. Paragraph 1., the Defendant, at the entrance of the university hospital emergency room of the Republic of Korea, abused the above E in his hand on the ground that she would remove him from the entrance of the university hospital emergency room due to the act as set forth in the above 1. Paragraph 1. and again enter the emergency room.

After that, the defendant was arrested by the police, and was placed on the floor of the above E, etc., and assaulted by the method of promptly asking E's misunderstanding, etc. at the resistance.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by E, who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Entry of the witness E in the third public trial protocol;

1. The defendant asserts that the performance of duties is illegal since he/she did not assault the victim C and police officers at the time of arrest, and the police officers did not notify of the 119 emergency medical services of the 119 emergency medical services.

However, in full view of C, E’s statement, victim pictures, etc., it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant used violence against C and police officers.

In addition, in light of the statement of E and the confirmation letter of arrest of flagrant offenders (written confirmation that the defendant was notified of the principle of 's name'), it is also recognized that police officers notified the principle of 's non-satisfy'.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and imprisonment with prison labor) concerning the crime;