[criminal record] On October 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan District Court on August 6, 2016. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant appealed from the Busan District Court Branch for two years, which was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court's Dong Branch, and the Defendant was still serving in the appellate trial at the Busan District Court (2017No1724).

[2] The Defendant: (a) was a person who worked as an intermediary assistant in the “E-authorized brokerage office” located in Busan Metropolitan Government Do; and (b) in ordinary real estate rental contracts, the lessor is entitled to enter the amount of the lease deposit in the amount of the lease deposit and the lessor is the monthly rent; and (c) the lessee prepares and delivers a false lease contract stating the amount of the lease deposit, which is different from the terms and conditions requested by the lessor, and then receives the lease deposit from the lessee to use it as the Internet gambling fund.

On December 21, 2016, when the Defendant prepares a lease contract at the above authorized brokerage office around 11:00, the Defendant arbitrarily affixed a new title of the leased contract to the lessor “O” in the indication column of real estate without the lessor’s prior permission, and issued the said lease contract to the lessee F in around 14:00 on the same day. In the intermediate payment column, the Defendant: (a) “Seoul Metropolitan City Transportation Daegu P; (b)” in the deposit column; (c) “Seoul million won; (d)” in the intermediate payment column; (e) “The payment of the gold to KRW 3 million; and (e) the payment of the gold to KRW 3 million; (e) the payment of the gold to KRW 5,00”; and (e) the new title of the lease that was prepared in advance after stating the lessor’s address, resident registration number, telephone number, and name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease contract under the name of O, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and delivered it to F as if it was a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to Qua 1.