However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Of the facts charged on April 16, 2016, the Defendant is obviously a clerical error in writing.

03:25 At the front side of Changwon-si, the police officer did not locked even after getting on a taxi and arrived at the destination. As such, the police officer of the Changwon Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of the above taxi article, committed assault by the police officer on the handling of D's face by assaulting D's 112-reports, such as c through 4 times the Defendant's shoulder shoulder, and c through drinking, the police officer's Dobbbbbbbbbbs, who was dispatched after receiving a report of the above taxi article, was able to break down the Defendant's shoulder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of the punishment of recommendation] There is no basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties [decision of sentence] [decision of sentence] 8 months of imprisonment, one year of the suspension of execution (the details and method of the crime, the degree of violence, the degree of violence, the reflection of the crime, the fact that there is no past record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine]