전세금반환
1. The defendant-appellant paid KRW 35 million to the plaintiff.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Under the facts based on the facts, the facts are deemed to have been led to confession as they did not dispute by the intervenor;
A. On January 4, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) leased the lease deposit amounting to KRW 35 million, the lease deposit period from Handong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant housing”); and (b) from January 19, 2016 to January 18, 2018; and (c) leased the same day with the move-in report and the fixed date granted.
B. Ulsan Construction Co., Ltd. transferred the instant house to D on April 10, 2017. On May 3, 2018, the Intervenor was transferred the instant house from D and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 3, 2018 during the course of the instant lawsuit brought by the Plaintiff against D.
(A) On February 2, 200, according to the facts of the above recognition, Defendant Receiving the legal procedure upon the Plaintiff’s application, and the lawsuit against D was withdrawn). The lease contract of this case was considerably apparent as the lease period has expired, and Defendant Receiving the building of this case and succeeding to the status of the lessor under the lease contract, the assignee is obligated to pay KRW 35 million to the Plaintiff.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant-appellant is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.