2. The judgment appears to have recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflect it, the degree of damage is not relatively excessive, and the victim’s recovery of all damaged goods is favorable, or the Defendant has been sentenced to the suspended sentence of two years in August 2008 and one year in imprisonment in 2013 due to the same crime, etc., and the Defendant has committed the instant crime repeatedly during the short period of repeated offense, and the Defendant has committed the instant crime repeatedly during the short period of repeated offense, and considering all kinds of sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the background and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.