2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, the defendant agreed with the representative of the company where the qualification of document-related crime was copied in the court below. However, each of the crimes of this case was prepared by using qualification for about one year and nine months, and exercising the means of access, exercising the means of access, taking them over, taking part in illegal game room business, theft of another's property, etc., and committing various crimes, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the responsibility for the crime is very heavy. The defendant has been punished several times due to the same or similar crimes in the past. The court below sentenced the judgment of the court below by taking full account of the favorable circumstances of the defendant, and there was no special reason to change the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the punishment imposed by the court below is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.