However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from around 13:00 on August 3, 2013 to 16:20 on the same day, was unable to receive KRW 13,00,000 of the deposit money for the said restaurant from the “F that operated the said restaurant before the victim,” and the victim, on the ground that the said restaurant was operated following the restaurant, expressed a large amount of the victim’s “culp, flap, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, etc.,” and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by forcibly force, by preventing customers from entering the restaurant, such as smoking, smoking, and smoking, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;