1. Basic facts are the representative director of (State) C, a mobile mobile phone sales agency. (State)C is a business structure that sells mobile phone (goods exchange right) issued by (State), (State), and (State), SK franchis (State), by proxy, and pays to (State), Kakao, (State), D, and SK frans (State) by consumers who purchase mobile phone, with a certain percentage of commission, and pays the remainder to the franchise business entity.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On November 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on November 10, 2015, obtained a loan of KRW 100 million from the victim’s (State) LAS LAW; (b) on behalf of the Defendant, through a mobile coo-phone sales through a mobile coo-phone sales through a mobile coo-type case operated by the victim’s (State) C Kakao and SK PPP (State); and (c) on behalf of the Defendant to provide the mobile coo-phones used from October 1, 2015 to November 10, 2016.

However, on October 2015, the Defendant agreed to transfer (State) the entire business sector of (State)C to E in a comprehensive manner. On February 28, 2016, the base date for the business transfer was determined as February 28, 2016, and the mobile coo used from March 1, 2016, the Defendant agreed to receive payment for the sales claim from (State) Kakao and SK fros (State) E (State) Kao and SK fros (State) c from that time to that time, there was no future claim to receive from (State) Kao and SK fros (State) c from that time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) concealed the aforementioned circumstances; (b) continued to sell mobile coophones to the victim; (c) provided as security any bonds to be received from (ju) Kakao and SK fran (ju); and (d) received KRW 100 million from the damaged party on November 10, 2015.

(b) A victim;