If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 6, 2016, at around 22:39, the Defendant: (a) is an expressway that “it is a person who intends to enter the roadway on the expressway,” after receiving 112 reports from the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency B Inspector C, sent to the site on the expressway, and there is a taxi on the expressway, the Defendant considered that she would move to a safe place on the expressway, after hearing the word, she was on board the back seat, and she was asked to ask questions about the developments leading up to the expressway located on the expressway at the direction of 9.5 kilometer-dong, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, a Metropolitan City, and was able to take a taxi on the expressway.” (b) When the Defendant was able to take a son on the road, she was able to take an inquiry about the circumstances leading up to the expressway, she was able to do so, and she was able to do so. (c) When she was able to do so.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives and bodies and the prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement C to the Act

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.