2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the fact that the Defendant appears to recognize and reflect all of his/her criminal acts; (b) the fact that the Defendant actively cooperated with the investigative agency; (c) the fact that the Defendant appears not to have led to the criminal acts; and (d) the fact that the judgment at the same time was rendered on February 9, 2017

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case including the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is too excessive and unfair, and it is difficult to view the defendant's above assertion that it is unfair in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, home environment, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the defendant was punished several times as a repeated crime due to the same crime, was committed again without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case, committed the crime of this case for a considerable period of time against many unspecified and unspecified victims. The sum of the amount of fraud was considerably large, and the crime was committed by sharing the roles systematically and systematically with many people.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.