beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고정1107

명예훼손

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chairperson of the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for the Representatives of Residents of Apartment C, and the victim D is the chairperson of the Housing Seniors Association and the chairperson of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee, etc., who filed a mutual complaint.

Around June 27, 2016, the Defendant posted a notice to allow the apartment residents to view the above amount when the Defendant received 460,000 won from the old office with a certificate of reporting the elderly's family under the title "the elderly's president (individual, D) on June 24, 2017 and the unfair operation of the elderly's association" under the title "on June 24, 2017, the elderly's council's operation expenses and 4.60,000 won (the beneficiary's account D account) or the withdrawal of the area", by stating that "the above amount is not received at the time of the beneficiary's withdrawal or cancellation of the area" on the bulletin board of the above C apartment.

The purpose of this paper is to stipulate the matters to be resolved on the elderly council in the title of the unfair operation of the elderly council, and among them, it contains the contents that the elderly's business operation expenses and whites are received as a victim's personal account, and that the victim's personal account is revoked due to the violation of criminal punishment and the victim's personal account, and the whole contents of the case are that the victim is unlawfully transferred the elderly's family operation expenses to the individual account. The fact is that the elderly's family operation expenses, etc. are transferred to the account under the name of the "C Apartment

The Defendant injured the victim’s honor to the purport that the victimized person was unfairly operating the senior citizens’ conference by openly pointing out false facts as above, and that the expenses were taken out.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;