교통사고처리특례법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant, who recognized the facts charged, runs against the Defendant.
However, on May 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence due to a non-licensed driving (six-time penalty of a fine, one-time suspended sentence, and one-time suspended sentence), and on May 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a six-month suspended sentence due to a non-licensed driving, and the sentence of the suspended sentence became final and conclusive on January 15, 2014, and the period of parole was expired on January 15, 2015.
The crime of this case is a bad one because he/she is driving without obtaining a license during the period of repeated crime and suffers an injury which requires a medical treatment of 90 days to his/her passengers and thus, the crime of this case is committed.
There was no agreement with the victim.
In addition, considering the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings, the sentence of the court below is not recognized as improper.
3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.