1. At around 11:00 on November 16, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) at the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim C (A, B, 58 years of age) to receive money from the victim’s husband; and (b) at the same time, the Defendant found the said restaurant as “a two-years, chewings, and her husband’s inner part” in order to obtain money from the victim’s husband; (c) he saws and takes a hondro, and honds, and talks to cut off, and attempt to put in the table table connected to the gasr; and (d) attempted to put in the water reservoir and to put in it, thereby interfering with the victim’s restaurant business.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by gathering and destroying the tree interest of 50,000 won at the time and place mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (the date, time, and place of interference with business of a suspect), each investigation report (the telephone investigation);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by chairs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Punishment to suspend a sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that it is recognized as an event room and reflects on it, the first crime, the fact that the damage is minor, and some of the circumstances to be taken into account in the course of committing the instant crime): Fine of 500,000 won (No. 100,000 won per day);