For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment that found the Defendant guilty of the injury among the facts charged of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the principle of court-oriented trials and the principle of substantial direct deliberation, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.