beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.13 2016가단54597

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 6 and the entire purport of the pleadings:

On September 4, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agency operation contract that was supplied with products from the Defendant and sold by B agency. The agreement includes the content that the Defendant would dispatch two promotional employees to B agency at the Defendant’s expense.

B. The Plaintiff operated the Defendant’s B agency by March 2016 under the agreement.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and determination: (1) The defendant's employee C incurred losses equivalent to the above amount from September 5, 2009 to May 10, 2015 by requiring the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff expenses although it was borne by the defendant, (2) the defendant's employee C who manages the agency's inventory management error in managing the company's inventory, and (3) the defendant's employee C suffered losses from the plaintiff due to the defendant's establishment of the agency's D agency, and the discount event of the competition company adjacent to the plaintiff's operation, which caused a decline in the above B agency's sales, but the defendant's employee C incurred stress on the plaintiff by unfairly conducting business affairs, such as failing to prepare measures therefor, and caused losses to the plaintiff, (6,842,640 won per annum, and (4) the defendant's obligation to pay damages to the plaintiff by 50% from the next day to the above 5th day of 2007 agency's total amount of damages to the plaintiff.