beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.03.30 2018고단235

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment in the name of “B”.

1. On July 18, 2017, from around September 6, 2017 to around September 6, 2017, the Defendant operated 'B' on the 3rd floor of Gyeonggi-si Co., Ltd., and had 12,000 won from many unspecified male customers who found to have been engaged in sexual traffic and received 120,000 won from her husband and female, and had D and E perform sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. Violation of the Immigration Control Act;

A. From July 15, 2017 to September 6, 2017, the Defendant operated a marina or commercial establishment at the place of the foregoing paragraph (1) from around July 15, 2017 to around September 6, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 1750,00 per month to F who is a foreigner of the mother’s nationality and did not obtain the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities in the Republic of Korea from the competent authority, and had him/her know about his/her nameless customers.

Accordingly, the defendant employed a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

B. From July 18, 2017 to September 6, 2017, the Defendant operated a marina or commercial establishment at the place of the foregoing paragraph (1) from around July 18, 2017 to around September 6, 2017, the Defendant had D and E, a foreign national of the Thailand, who did not obtain the status of stay from the competent authority to engage in job-seeking activities in the Republic of Korea, and had D and E carry out commercial sex acts on the condition that they pay 40,00 won per time

Accordingly, the defendant employed a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Medical Service Act employed the above F, which is not a 1750,000 won per month, at the time, at the place, and on the condition that he would pay the above F, which is not a 1.75 million won per month, and had the women take the place by means of suppressing telegraph by using hand.

Accordingly, even though the defendant is not a massage doctor, a massage practice is conducted.

참조조문