The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly adopted by the court below and the first instance court, it is just to determine that the court below convicted all of the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, by misapprehending the legal principles on deception or intention in fraud, by violating the presumption of innocence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the public offering in joint principal offenders in violation of the principle of liability, thereby affecting

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.