사해행위취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: “Joint 7 of the third party judgment of the court of the first instance” is as follows: “Joint ... 5.7 billion won loaned to V in violation of its duties on March 31, 2010, thereby causing damages equivalent to the same amount to the savings bank; “total 26.12 billion won damages” in the third party 12 column “total 3.1.828 billion won damages”; “1538,200 won” in the fourth party 2 column “145,863,200 won”; “The debt of 26.1 billion won” in the fourth party 5 of the fourth party judgment “The debt of 31.28 billion won” is changed to “the debt of 5 billion won” and “the witness of the court of the second instance” in the fourth party 31.17 of the Criminal Procedure Act to “the witness of the court of the third party 18.3 billion won testimony.”
2. As such, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified on the ground of its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.