A. In fact-finding the defendant did not open the victim, and the victim sleeps the hack pipe and slicks the victim in the process of preventing the defendant from displaying the hack pipe.

(The injured party saw the malk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stalk's stal

The sentence of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (fine 3 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On the day of the instant case, the lower court argued that the Defendant had the same purport as the allegation of mistake in the lower court. As to this, the lower court stated that: (i) the Defendant had the victim complained of the victim’s pain by communicating with the victim on the day of the instant case; and (ii) the victim visited the police station along with the victim to the effect that he was faced with the victim’s knish loss; and (iii) the victim visited the hospital on the day of the instant case to the effect that he was faced with the victim’s knish loss; and (iv) the victim was hospitalized upon the diagnosis of the injury of the “nittert 2 presse, humthum, typump, typump, salt, and tension”; (iii) the police officer visited the H hospital hospital hospitalized by the victim on July 10, 2015 that the victim was pushed with the victim as well as the victim’s name and knished; and (v) the victim was hospitalized and discharged from the hospital for more than five days after the victim’s name and the victim.