The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charge of this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the offense of insult.

In addition, the argument that the court below erred in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to the grounds for appeal for the exclusion of illegality is not a legitimate ground for appeal, since the defendant's ground for appeal does not consider it as the grounds for appeal or the court below did not consider it as the subject of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.