On May 1, 2014, the Defendant called the “C” office operated by the Defendant on May 1, 2014 to F, the head of the distribution team of the E Co., Ltd., the victim D, and paid the transportation charge on the last day of each month when he carries foodstuffs, etc. from the Tan G Distribution Center to the G Logistics Center.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to pay transport charges to the victim because it is difficult for the defendant to use the transport charges for the repayment of his/her liability even if he/she received the transport charges from the original contractor who requested the transportation of the defendant, such as that he/she incurred a loss by directly purchasing and transporting agricultural products and bears the obligation equivalent to KRW 50 million.

The Defendant provided services equivalent to KRW 22,797,50 from around the time of damage to September 14, 2014, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. A second-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;