When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 06:50 on January 18, 2020, the Defendant was faced with disturbance, such as when she was friendly D and fluencing D’s head at the ‘C restaurant located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan.’. On January 18, 2020, the Defendant continued to walking the above F’s back kne on one occasion due to the defect that the slopeF belonging to E-gu, Busan-dong Police Station E-gu, Busan-gu, which received 112 reports and sent back to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault, and assaulted the above F’s buck part as a flucs, without any particular reason.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement statement F, each police officer's statement about H;

1. Application of CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs of D police statements and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the act of obstructing the performance of official duties by sentencing is likely to disregard public authority and disrupt criminal justice procedures, and thus, the defendant’s liability for the crime needs not be mitigated.

However, the Defendant stated that the facts charged are recognized and against the Defendant, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and determining the punishment as ordered by taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.