When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 10. 11. 04:10 경 울산시 남구 C에 있는 D 주점 앞에서. “ 손님 2명이 싸운다“ 라는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 남부 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 순경 F( 남, 26세) 이 피고인을 상대로 무슨 일이냐며 묻자 "야 이 짭새 새끼야. 이 좆 밥 새끼야. 죽고 싶나

In doing the bath theory, F interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties for about 20 minutes, such as putting a brue to F with a view to committing a crime, putting F’s brue upon the Defendant, putting him in a brue, pushing his hand, blaging his hand, etc., and flaging him into a flag, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of statutes on standing photographs, on-site CCTV photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;