If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 10, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant’s office of Busan apartment C, stating that “I will invite people who will engage in the business of raising sing down-to-door packing hands-on,” by accessing the Internet site D, and reported this fact to the Victim F (35 years old), who called “I will deposit KRW 200,000 with the daily material deposit made at home-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-door-to-face-to-face-

However, even if the defendant received the finished product, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the deposit and work expenses, and was planned to use the above money for living expenses, etc.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 200,00 from the victim through the H account (I) in the name of G on December 10, 2017, and received KRW 90,000 as the source of materials around December 20, 2017, and received KRW 108,000 under the same name as the source of materials around December 26, 2017, and received KRW 108,000 under the same name. On January 5, 2018, the Defendant did not transfer KRW 56,000 from the victim’s working number after receiving the delivery of the victim’s working number. On January 10, 2018, the Defendant acquired KRW 527,000 by deceiving the total amount of KRW 527,00,00 from the victim’s working in the name of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit slip copies;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the defendant of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order acknowledged a mistake, the defendant did not appear in the court and have been paid for the damage.

It has the power to suspend the execution of imprisonment due to fraud.

In light of these circumstances, the amount of fine under the summary order is appropriate.