However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who was married to the victim B (72) and was divorced for about 10 years before the marriage, and the victim C (51) is a child of the above B.

1. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at around 09:40 on May 20, 2017, on the part of the victim B, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant’s business, on the ground that he did not restore the lost soil due to the Defendant’s argument from around 016, without restoring the victim’s discussion; (c) was engaged in the “rogateing” in a usual manner to the victim’s debate in order to hold the victim’s argument; and (d) prevented the Defendant from gathering the victim by driving the Defendant’s Track and driving the Defendant’s Track as the victim’s debate to pay his wheels.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the cultivation of crops by force, such as the in-house work of the victim.

2. A special assault Defendant: (a) has been raised against the victim C to embling the debate as described in paragraph 1 at the time and place described in paragraph 1; and (b) has been raised against the victim C; and (c) the victim’s “Isson superior, Isson, Isson, and n family weather shall be discarded.”

D. The victim's part of the body was sealed several times by inserting a dangerous object in possession, which is one of the dangerous objects in the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

3. On May 23, 2017, at around 19:30 on May 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered that the Defendant was frighted in the discussions owned by the victim B as indicated in paragraph (1); (b) destroyed the Defendant’s mother so that the recovery cost would be approximately KRW 2.20,000,000 in a way that he was frightered into the victim’s debate and took part in the fleet with the victim’s wheels; and (c) destroyed the Defendant’s mother.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Parts of each statement made by the prosecution B and C in the suspect examination protocol against the accused;

1. Each internal report, Track photographs, victim's essay photographs;