However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 08:30 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim’s part of the kitchen, which is a dangerous object that the victim C takes from his own house, on the ground that the victim C takes a half-end and bath in Gyeyang Park 106, Mayang-gu, Seo-gu, Seodong-ro, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, the Defendant threatened the victim’s part of the ship (29cm in length, 16.5cm in total length) three times every direction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that there is a record of being sentenced to the suspension of execution for the same kind of crime as the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, it is necessary to impose a penalty upon a defendant, but it is against the crime, the victim does not want the punishment, and the circumstances leading to the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by the order;