However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who has performed early-related work at the construction site.

When a foreigner intends to work in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and no person shall employ a person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, on March 4, 2017, the Defendant employed 110,000 won per day from May 30, 2017 to November 12, 2017, a foreign national B (B, C,) of China, who entered Jeju-do as Jeju-do free will, and employed 8 Chinese nationality foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment as described in the attached Table of Crimes, at the construction site and D construction site located in Seopopopopo City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of B, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Accusation of an immigration offender or written opinion;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes regarding inquiries under each immigration record;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution in that there is a great social harm, such as the mass production of illegal aliens who abuse the Jeju-do-doless certificate system.

The number of foreigners employed by the defendant is small, and the period of employment is about six months.

However, considering the fact that the accused recognizes the crime and reflects the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, as well as the one-time punishment of fines, the accused has been subject to criminal punishment, and other circumstances, such as the accused’s age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence is to be determined as per Disposition.