However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 07:00 on October 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) inducedd the victim D (the 51-year-old) of the victim D (the 51-year-old) with C1 floor E in the operation of this E; (b) had no intent or ability to pay the amount despite the absence of any effective means of settlement in possession; (c) deceiving the victim by the method of ordering two weeks of the payment as if he/she would pay the amount; and (d) obtained the delivery of three Skick and Skick equivalent to the total amount of KRW 1,200,00 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Simplified receipts:

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, such as the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be sentenced to the same sentence as the order.

Conditions disadvantageous: The fact that there are several criminal records for the same kind of crime, and that there is no repayment of damage: The fact that the defendant has led to the confession of the crime.