However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the employee of D, the victim E (41) is the representative director of F Co., Ltd., and G is the representative director of D.

On December 21, 2017, at around 00:52, the Defendant heard the phrase “I” from the victim and G to the victim, “this would not interfere with G Na’s problem.” On several occasions, the Defendant sawd the victim’s head on one occasion with an empty disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and inflicted two weeks of treatment on the victim. In addition, the Defendant inflicted two weeks of treatment on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under the Criminal Act is committed by the defendant due to an empty injury to the victim's head due to an empty injury. It is disadvantageous to the defendant in light of the method of the crime, degree of injury, danger, etc., and the nature of the crime in question is grave, and the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime in this case, the defendant agreed with the victim, and the victim expressed his intent not to have the defendant punished, and the defendant expressed his intention not to have the defendant punished. In addition, the crime of this case is sentenced to the same sentence as the disposition in consideration of various circumstances, such as character, behavior,