If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On December 9, 2012, at around 12:20 on December 12:12, 2012, the Defendant avoided disturbance, such as taking food and drinking in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, taking food and beverage into consideration, and taking food and beverage into consideration.

At around 12:35 of the same day, the Defendant recommended the border E, who belongs to the Seoul Guro Police Station D District, who was dispatched after receiving a report of the above disturbance, to return home, and obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to police patrol duties by assaulting him, such as intending to walk the E’s bridge due to the appearance, and intending to walk the E’s bridge by drinking the E once a week, and intending to turn off the E’s boat into drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. Report on the use of police gear;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.