beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.31 2018나2026183

공탁금 출급청구권 확인

Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding a counterclaim shall be revoked.

2. On June 1, 2017, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A. On May 17, 2015, the Plaintiff’s meeting held a resolution on the following items:

(2) (2) The Defendant, in the case of the Plaintiff’s delegation pastors, intends to dysium for more than 20 years in one branch church and to dysium for a gold time. In accordance with Article 27(7) of the Constitution, the Defendant, pursuant to Article 27(7) of the Constitution, has agreed to obtain a resolution from the Plaintiff to dysium for the dysium and receive a number of the participants in the meeting. (3) Cases concerning the honorable treatment of the dysium pastors ① Housing (one house is purchased to the Defendant, who is the dysium)

In order to purchase the Defendant’s housing, 50,000 won was financed by the Plaintiff’s housing as security, and the housing was purchased after two years from Jun. 2, 2015 to May 2017, 200. (2) Dominium paid 60,000 won and 50,000 won of advance payment, which were entered as an installment savings deposit, are as Dominium 1:65,00,000 won * 2:149,000 won of advance payment (the due date of December 31, 2015) * 60,000 won of advance payment : 0,000 won, apartment house 274,000,000 won, 30,000 won per house and 0,000 won of advance payment ; and 4.0,000 won of advance payment per house, the Defendant, however, has obtained the Plaintiff’s consent to the change of the contents of advance payment 0.

The proviso clause was attached without discussion with the author at the time of the contract.

However, in order to become a director according to the original purpose of the honorable treatment of the original pastor, the security deposit will be received at a low price as the contractor at the time of termination of the lease contract.

And the deposit money.