2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Although the instant crime was committed on one occasion by simple medication, narcotics crimes have a significant risk of suffering from addiction and society, and the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for an injury on Sept. 2, 2015 and was sentenced to eight months on Sept. 15, 2016, without being aware of the completion of the execution of the instant punishment, constitutes a repeated offender without being aware of any special relationship or change in circumstances that may be newly considered in the trial, and the sentencing guidelines, including the Defendant’s age, living environment, family relations, and criminal records and their relationship (one time to suspend the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime on Sept. 23, 2015), and the sentencing guidelines, based on recommendations and recommendations within the scope of one year or more.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.