폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. In the facts charged, the Defendant, as the owner of the building “C”, has brought a dispute over the payment of the price for the construction of the Da (57 years old) and the Dogra, which was subcontracted with the construction of the Dogra.
On February 13, 2015, at around 09:10, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as “C building” No. 10 201, 10,201, and “E, a staff member of the club, paid KRW 50,00,00,00 for hospital expenses,” and “E, a staff member of the club, paid the victim the above loan water supply pipe to the victim.”
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;
B. On October 17, 2016, after the prosecution of the instant case, the victim withdrawn his wish to punish the Defendant.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;