If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 12:58 on April 2, 2019, the Defendant: (a) purchased clothing from a victim’s employee G while purchasing clothes, the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not live in the Category D 2 operated by the victim C, EtelF; and (b) received clothes from the victim’s employee G even though the Defendant’s wife did not account transfer the purchase price of clothes; (c) the Defendant purchased clothing from the victim’s employee G, “I live in the EtelF near the store; (d) 4:30 p.m. of the 4:0 p.m.; and (e) the Defendant, even at the D remedy point, transferred the clothes on credit because there is a deficit that he purchased clothes on credit, and thus, acquired the clothes and bats of an amount of KRW 868,800 from G to the market price.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site inspection and complaint;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;