However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area.

On March 21, 2014, at around 05:30, the Defendant, at the time of Suwon-si, worked as a road suitable for the crosswalks in front of the CU convenience store in the vicinity of the military court of Young-gu, Suwon-si.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, and it is not possible to be a U-turn, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person or not, and to check whether he/she is a person or not.

Nevertheless, the victim D (the age of 62) who dried the crosswalk due to negligence, disregarding the crosswalk signal as it is, was found to be the front part of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s injury to pressure 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents)

) The accident place is not an expressway or motorway, so the proviso of Article 3(2) proviso of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents cannot be applied because the accident place is not an expressway or motorway.

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following reasons for sentencing) shall be recommended.