On May 31, 2014, at around 08:15, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by using the Docs of the Changwon Police Station D, Changwon-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, on the breath of May 31, 2014, the Defendant took the above Docs of the police box while under the influence of alcohol, including, but not limited to, whether the dead gue is a police officer, who was in the event of the father of the Republic of Korea; (b) 15 minutes of the disturbance; and (c) the said Docs of the police box, the Defendant took the 86cm back on the left side of the above E, and she took the breath of the left side, such as the left boom, the left bal of the left side, etc., once again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of police officers' crimes and other public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged police officers and criminal tools photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. In full view of the following: (a) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, found a police station box without any justifiable reason while under the influence of alcohol and brea the police officer to obstruct the police officer’s performance of official duties; (b) the Defendant, who committed a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, committed a serious crime that denies the rule of law; and (c) the Defendant was sentenced one time to a suspended sentence for committing a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties and was sentenced two times to a suspended sentence for committing a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act; and (d) there are various criminal records that

In addition, considering all the factors such as the criminal records of the defendant and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the punishment against the defendant shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines, such as the order.