When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The facts charged include the fact that the defendant took a bath to E, but it is not deemed that the prosecutor did not prosecute the defendant as a crime of insult, and the prosecutor did not prosecute the public official performing his duties. The part of the facts charged (the part of assaulting the public official performing his duties) corresponding to the obstruction of performance of official duties is organized as follows and recognized the facts charged.

At around 03:00 on July 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant from the said singing employee, and received a recommendation from the police officer’s slope E belonging to the D Zone at the police station for returning home during the period of learning called, the Defendant assaulted the police officer who performed legitimate duties with regard to the handling of the 112 Report Report Report Cases, such as interesting during the drunken period and breathing off the E’s right hand hand, and booming off the E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of a fine (the degree of violence is relatively heavy, and circumstances such as the fact that the defendant has yet to be a student)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The act of assaulting a police officer in the course of performing official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good, but it is against the nature and depth of a crime without any record of crime, and E is against the dignity of the defendant (the Investigation Record 16 pages).