2. There are factors for sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes in this case and reflected, and that the defendant seems to have no economic benefits derived from the crime in this case.

However, the Defendant committed the instant crime only with sufficient knowledge that the Defendant was guilty of a large number of criminal records, and committed the instant crime without being aware of it, and committed the instant crime again, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished several times for the same kind of crime, and thus, he/she committed the instant crime even though he/she was sufficiently aware that the transfer of the access media can be abused for scaming.

In addition, considering the following circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.