협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On June 3, 2017, at around 03:30 on June 3, 2017, the Defendant alleged in the instant facts charged to the Victim E (53 tax, female) who was the owner of the D main shop located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and who was dissatisfied with C, the Defendant stated that the Defendant “if he wishes to live in the Republic of Korea,” and
c. d.s.
“........” and “...................”
"In the end, the victim was threatened."
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the same Act. The judgment can be acknowledged on September 28, 2017, which was after the victim E institution of the instant indictment, as the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the above defendant. Accordingly, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.