2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant should support his family.

However, the crime of this case by the defendant was committed by deceiving the victim who intends to engage in marina business to use a Magro, thereby deceiving 8,60,000 won in total. The defendant actively created a false text message conversation to the effect that Magro enters the territory of Thailand and deceivings it to the victim. The crime of this case is not very good, such as that all the money obtained by deception is scambling and thrown away, and that there was a number of criminal records other than those sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the same kind of fraud on April 7, 2016 at the Ulsan District Court, Ulsan District Court, as well as that there was a number of criminal records other than that sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the same kind of fraud on April 7, 2016, it cannot be deemed that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, taking into account all the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the age, character and environment, means and result leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances after

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.