If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

At around 22:00 on July 29, 201, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating false facts to the following effect: (a) the Defendant did not have obtained the Defendant’s money, and (b) the Defendant did not have obtained the Defendant’s money. However, the Defendant was an employee, F, G, and other customers; (c) “D is a person who became aware of money; (d) is a person who is removed from the fixed value of the drinking water.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of F and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Application of each statute on police statements made to D and H;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;