The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

피고인들은 공모하여 2011. 10. 17. 10:56경부터 18:22경까지 부천시 원미구 D 3층에 있는 피해자 E 운영의 F 고시텔 내에서 피고인들이 고시텔에서 생활을 하면서 입실료를 지불하지 않아 고시텔에서 근무하는 종업원이 피고인들의 고시원 출입문을 발로 찼다는 이유로 피해자에게 “씹할년 지랄하고 있네 네 마음대로 하라”고 욕설을 하며 고시텔 복도에서 고함을 지르는 등 약 7시간에 걸쳐서 위력으로서 피해자의 고시텔 영업업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G and H;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written statements by G and H;

1. Defendants: Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants alleged that there was no interference with the victim’s business as stated in the facts charged in the instant case. However, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Defendants’ assertion that the Defendants’ assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel did not interfere with the victim’s business is sufficient to fully recognize the fact that they interfere with the victim’s business by force, such as exerting the victim’s abusive view and committing the Defendants in the public notice telehallway.