구상금
1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, the Defendants each of the amounting to KRW 62,242,090 to the Plaintiff and the amounting to KRW 58,518.
1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the Parties, or are recognized by each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including paper numbers) and Eul evidence 1 to 4 (including paper numbers):
A. The Plaintiff acquired bonds, such as the entry of the grounds for the claim in attached Form D with respect to D.
B. On June 10, 2014, D succeeded to the property of the deceased’s 1/2 shares, which are the children of the deceased. However, the Defendants received the report on qualified acceptance of the deceased’s inherited property on November 27, 2014 by filing a report on qualified acceptance with respect to the deceased’s inherited property with the District Court High Court Decision 2014Ra1401.
2. If so, the Defendants are liable to pay to the Plaintiff the money indicated in the order equivalent to each inheritance share among the net D’s obligations, within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.
3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified.