대기환경보전법위반등
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 5,000,000, respectively.
Defendant
A above.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B A corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of synthetic resin manufacturing business, etc. in Chungcheongnam-gun E, Chungcheongbuk-gun, and Defendant A is a representative director of the above corporation.
1. A person who intends to install emission facilities of air pollutants, such as a mixture facility with a volume of at least three cubic meters in cubic meters or with a volume of at least 10 mac meters, or a mixture facility of solid wastes with a volume of at least 50 cubic meters, shall file a report thereon with the Mayor/Do Governor in accordance with the Air Quality Conservation Act, and where the maximum volume of wastewater per day is at least 0.1 cubic meters when discharging wastewater that does not contain any specific substance harmful to water quality, he/she shall file a report thereon with the Minister of Environment in accordance with the Act on the Conservation of Water Quality and Aquatic Villages, and where a person who intends to install noise emission facilities, such as a compressed machine with a capacity of at least 10 mac meters, a mixture of at least 50 mac meters,
On November 20, 2014, in the process of manufacturing the PVC pipes by the above B Co., Ltd., the Defendant did not file a report on installation of the atmosphere emission facilities when installing and operating three mixing facilities with 75 masts of power, and four upper material storage facilities with the volume of 63.78 cubic meters of volume. In the process of manufacturing products, the Defendant did not file a report on installation of the wastewater emission facilities even though the maximum cooling wastewater volume of 2 metres was generated in the process of manufacturing products, even though the maximum cooling wastewater volume of 2 metres was generated in the process of manufacturing. In addition, the Defendant did not file a report on installation of the noise emission facilities while installing and operating the 75 mast of power-driven type three facilities with the 20 mast, three mixed-type, 75 mast of volume, and 50 mast of volume.
2. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant, installed and operated emission facilities without filing a report on installation of various emission facilities as described in paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. Report on results of business trips and the site for photographs;
1. The official document of administrative disposition (order of suspension of use) and each report of commencement of operation shall be accepted;