beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.04 2015고단1864

절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on March 26, 2015, the Defendant: (b) in a manner that the employees, such as E, etc., located in the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, took advantage of the gaps in which the surveillance of employees, such as E, who are the head of the said Mart, was neglected, stolen one of the number of tropia or the drinking water, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 1,200, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 1,200, and one of the mobilization slot cans that are equivalent to KRW 1,650, the market price of which is KRW 1,650.

"2015 Highest 7138"

1. 피고인은 2015. 10. 13. 19:10경 부산 F에 있는 G 내 지하1층 식품매장에서, 매장 매니저인 피해자 H의 감시가 소홀한 틈을 타 진열대에 놓여 있던 시가 2,600원 상당인 ‘칼슘이 풍부한 멸치아삭’ 1개, 시가 1,300원 상당인 ‘올가 키즈 딸기 그대로’ 1개, 시가 2,900원 상당인 ‘맛밤’ 1개, 시가 1,400원 상당인 ‘카페라떼 마일드’ 1개 등 합계 8,200원 상당인 식품을 준비해 간 검은색 숄더백에 몰래 넣고, 계산을 하지 않은 채 식품매장을 나오는 방법으로 절취하였다.

2. At around 19:25 on the same day as Paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant: (a) stolen food worth KRW 10,500,00 in total, including 10,500,000, total market price of 4,500 won and 6,000, i.e., “heatland & rice m. m. m. m. m. m.,” from the “I” of the 1st underground floor of the above G department store; and (b) cut off food store without calculating it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each statement to K and J, and a written statement to E;

1. Seizure records, investigation reports (not subject to seizure/value receipts), application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] general property.