beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.06.28 2015구단1029

요양불승인처분취소

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 2, 2014, while the Plaintiff (B) was working as a tree at the construction site of Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si, on May 2, 2014, the Plaintiff (B) was involved in an accident where the head of the joint board 2, which was on the part of the construction site, is away from the strong wind and shock of the Plaintiff’s timber and shoulder.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disaster”) b.

On June 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the first medical care with the Defendant for the “fluorial fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluort”

8. The medical care benefits and temporary layoff benefits have been received until 24.

C. The Plaintiff’s explanation to the Defendant on October 1, 2014

8. 25. From 25. to the same year.

9. Although the Defendant filed a claim for medical care expenses up to October 16, 2014, on the ground that the existing period of approval for medical care was sufficient for the treatment period (hereinafter “instant disposition for installment payment”), the Plaintiff filed a request for review on October 20, 2014 and filed a request for review on December 26, 2014, but was entirely dismissed.

On October 1, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for an additional injury or disease to the Defendant on the ground that the link between the instant disaster and the existing medical care recognized on November 9, 2015 is not recognized. The Plaintiff rendered a non-approval on the ground that the link between the instant accident and the “eromatic salt, left-hand salt,” which was approved for medical care, is not recognized.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition of non-approval for the Additional Injury and Disease”). 【No dispute exists, the entry in Gap evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 1, 5 through 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The joint board with the Plaintiff’s argument is 12m thickness, 1,224m length, 2,40m length, weight 18.8mg, and the accident itself cannot be deemed minor. The Plaintiff’s assertion was already approved for medical care.