If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On June 18, 2013, from around 02:26 to 02:43 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s general restaurant business by force, by force, such as avoiding a disturbance with the victim’s general restaurant business, on the ground that the victim was unable to drink his/her business within the instant D restaurant operated by the victim B, on the ground that he/she had been unable to drink and drink his/her business.

2. On June 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was arrested and detained in the act of interference with business under the preceding paragraph (1) within the police box, which was in force, around 03:00, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the report and the receipt of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to B and F

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;