SECTION 1-B, 2-B, 300,00,00

(2) Crimes;

On October 28, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year or two years of imprisonment with labor for violating the Act on the Budgeting and Management of Subsidies, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 5 of the same year, and is currently in the grace period. The Ministry of Employment and Labor implements the employment assistance project to expand or strengthen the provision of employment services to the vulnerable class. The Ministry of Employment and Labor selects a job placement service entity with excellent employment referral performance, etc. and pays subsidies and performance-based bonuses to

On September 16, 2010, the Defendant established a mutual placement service entity of “D” in the Dong-gu, Ulsan Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Seoul with a view to securing a large number of workers’ list, and subsequently, calculated the pertinent D’s performance as if he/she arranged the employment of the relevant workers, so that he/she would be selected as an employment assistance business entity (daily disease) by manipulating the performance as if he/she arranged the employment of the relevant workers, and received the subsidies and piece rates from the

1. Part of subsidies from an operating institution;

A. From January 1, 2010 to October 31 of the same year, the Defendant filed an application for employment assistance in the second half of 2010 with the Ministry of Employment and Labor of the Ministry of Employment and Labor of Ulsan-dong 1604-2, the Defendant, as if D had arranged employment of 191 workers from around January 1, 2010 to around October 31 of the same year, accompanied by false documents, such as “receiving job seeking and job placement register.”

On the 19th day of the same month, the Defendant was selected as a private-out enterprise by 2011, through the examination procedure of the examiners of the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Office who believed this, D was selected as a private-out enterprise in the second half of 2010.

As a result, the defendant was 6.72 million won around December 13, 2010, 13.5 million won around March 10, 201, and 13.5 million won around March 10, 201.

4.22.Around 22.13.5 million won, the same year.

7.14.Around 14.13.5 million won, and around 19.19.19.00,000 won under the name of the operating institution’s subsidy.