If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a NAS car.

On July 23, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car on July 14:25, 2018, and led the Defendant to drive the said car at a speed of about 40km from the side of the Gwangju Dam at approximately 40km from the same side of the ancient Dam.

At that time, there was a center line of yellow-ray and a road bended to the right side, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke, thereby overcoming the center line, and got off the part of the victim C(79 years old) driving in the opposite direction, which was driven by the Defendant’s negligence, on the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant’s car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence the injury to the victim E (the aged 76) who was accompanied by approximately 6 weeks of treatment, including a 2-day therapy of the left-hand 2 balance, a chest fright and tension in need of treatment for about 2- weeks, and a chest flasing so on to the victim E (the aged 76) who was accompanied by the above Haussop car for about 6-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. A traffic accident analysis report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each medical certificate and each opinion;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The criminal records of the defendant, the nature and risk of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading up to the crime, the degree of damage of the victims, and whether they were recovered (the defendant paid KRW 15 million to the victims after institution of the prosecution) for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, family relation of the defendant, and the family relation of the defendant.